James Crisp. Freelance journalist in Brussels.

Hire me for journalism, moderation, and sparkling copy

Parliament divisions stop joint resolution to save environmental laws

MEPs were unable to secure a joint resolution calling for the environmental laws to be saved, but 60% of them voted in favour of similar proposals. [European Parliament/Flickr]

MEPs were unable to secure a joint resolution calling for the environmental laws to be saved, but 60% of them voted in favour of similar proposals. [European Parliament/Flickr]

The European Parliament’s failure to pass a joint resolution against the Commission’s ditching of green legislation does not mean it backs the decision, MEPs and campaigners have said.

Cracks between different political groups meant the Parliament could not pass a single proposal. But more than 60% of MEPs voted for separate resolutions, all of which supported the environmental bills, they said.

Yesterday (15 January) in Strasbourg, the Parliament voted on a series of resolutions put forward by theSocialists & Democrats, the liberals (ALDE), GreensGUE/NGL, and Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy groups.

All called for pending EU laws on waste and recycling, known as the Circular Economy package, to be spared the axe from the Commission’s work programme for 2015.

The resolutions also pushed for guarantees over the future of expanded air pollution rules in revisions to the National Emission Ceilings (NEC) Directive. There are concerns that they could be delayed.

Each group acted individually, after the European People’s Party (EPP) and European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) groups pulled out of talks for a joint resolution. They also put forward their own proposals.

None of the individual proposals were able to secure a majority. Liberals, Socialists and Greens did club together to vote for single amendments criticising the withdrawal of the bills. Each of the three groups’ amendments on waste and air quality received narrow majorities of between 327 and 332 votes.

Most EPP and ECR MEPs voted against the amendments, backing their own resolutions instead. Those avoided open criticism of the Commission’s plans, Bearder said.

While that can be interpreted as backing for the Commission’s drive to cut red tape from those groups, campaigners point to the fact that five out of the seven groups in the Parliament wanted the laws saved.

Read>>Whole story on Euractiv

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on February 23, 2015 by in Environment, Journalism and tagged , , .

Follow me on Twitter

Categories

Follow James Crisp. Freelance journalist in Brussels. on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Archives

Europressos

Una llave para salir a la otra Europa de la UE

Rachel Spencer Writes

Journalist, Copywriter and Communications Consultant

%d bloggers like this: