James Crisp. Freelance journalist in Brussels.

Hire me for journalism, moderation, and sparkling copy

Funds to fight death penalty spread too thin

“Modest” EU funding earmarked to fight the death penalty and torture across the world is spread too thinly across too many projects, and is being spent in countries with little hope of reform, the European Court of Auditors has warned.

The European Commission and the EU’s foreign affairs service, the EEAS, has offered a robust defence of their policy, which funds NGOs fighting for human rights.

€100.9 million was split between 183 projects in more than 120 countries over 2007-2013, said the auditors, who scrutinise the EU’s financial management, in a report published today (23 September).

58 countries still have the death penalty, and every year more than 5,000 executions take place.

Klaus-Heiner Lehne, member of the European Court of Auditors, said, “The EU is already very active in this field but the funding for its efforts to fight torture and to eliminate the death penalty is spread too thinly.  Europe’s voice can be more effective if the money is better targeted.”

NGOs apply for grants from the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR), which is under the supervision of the executive’s DG Development.

As part of the application process the civil society groups outline their goals. But many of the projects did not achieve them, according to the auditors, and the system to evaluate their success, and the applications for grant were lacking.

The resources needed to be targeted better and backed up with other EU action, such as diplomacy and traditional development support, auditors said.

The European Commission stated that it was “fully convinced of the effectiveness of the EIDHR as one of several instruments in the fight against torture and the death penalty”.

It argued that even if there was little chance of reform in some countries, that was not a reason not to support NGOS in those countries.

The death penalty and torture were sensitive and complex areas, where progress was often slow and the impact of civil society organisation’s work difficult to quantify, it added.

The executive and the EEAS pointed to the American Bar Association’s acknowledgement of the role of an EIDHR grant in the abolition of the death penalty in Pennsylvania, USA.

>>Read: Whole story on EurActiv.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


This entry was posted on September 24, 2015 by in Development, Human rights, Journalism and tagged .

Follow me on Twitter


Follow James Crisp. Freelance journalist in Brussels. on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.



Una llave para salir a la otra Europa de la UE

Rachel Spencer Writes

Journalist, Copywriter and Communications Consultant

%d bloggers like this: